header header
uems logo

UNION EUROPÉENNE DES MÉDECINS SPÉCIALISTES

EUROPEAN UNION OF MEDICAL SPECIALISTS

Association internationale sans but lucratif International non-profit organisation
RUE DE L`INDUSTRIE, 24
BE - 1040 BRUSSELS
www.uems.eu
T +32 2 649 51 64
F +32 2 640 37 30
info@uems.eu

EACCME® participant’s evaluation form

1) Quality of the event *

How useful for your professional activity did you find this event?


What was your overall impression of this event?

Programme

Organisation

2) Relevance of the event *

Did the event fulfill your educational goals and expected learning outcomes?


Was the presented information well balanced and consistently supported by a valid scientific evidence base?


How useful to you personally was each session?

Session 1: CELA@SITE - Complex aorta: Limitation for endovascular treatment

Session 2: Vascular ART@SITE - Top secrets for PAD treatment. My choice

Session 4: Free papers Aorta and PAD

Session 5: LIVE@SITE - Rapid Fire Session

Session 6: Challenging cases Aorta and PAD

Session 7: LINC@SITE - Hot topics in PAD: Where do we stand one year later?

Session 8: IMENDO FORUM@SITE / FYA@SITE - Tips & tricks in BTK

Session 9: HTDI@SITE: The open surgery fate

Session 11: EVES@SITE - About stents and imaging in PAD

Session 12: CEC@SITE - Bailout solutions today, future directions tomorrow for aortic endo-repair

Session 13: VIP@SITE/ New Frontiers@SITE - The aortic team update

Session 14: Innovation session

Session 15: Best posters in Aorta and PAD

Session 16: Porto Vascular Conference@SITE - What´s new in carotid intervention?

Session 17: Challenging cases and posters carotid

Session 18: Highlights from the board

3) Suitability of formats used during the event *

Was there adequate time available for discussions, questions & answers and learner engagement?

4) Ways the event affects clinical practice *

Will the information you learnt be implemented in your practice?

5) Commercial bias *

Did all the faculty members provide their potential conflict of interest declaration with the sponsor(s) as a second slide of their presentation?

Do you agree that the information was overall free of commercial and other bias?